• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

mkpeReport

top analysis covering digital cinema, 3-D, HFR, and laser illumination

  • Reports
  • About
  • mkpe.com
  • cinepedia.com

Digital Cinema Equipment as Collateral?

August 2009 by Michael Karagosian

A fundamental shift has taken place in digital cinema lending patterns, affecting the activities of 3rd party digital cinema deployment entities. The structure of these entities was first contemplated by studios in the closing days of DCI’s business activities in 2005. (DCI stands for Digital Cinema Initiatives, a joint venture of the six major motion picture studios.) At that time, deployment entities were envisioned as a capital resource, either having cash on hand or having acquired the funds to purchase digital cinema systems, after which they would engage in equipment lending agreements with exhibitors. In turn, the deployment entities would receive “virtual print fees” (VPFs) to recoup their investments.

The one entity successful in executing this style of business is Cinedigm. The result is a company burdened with massive debt, with net interest expense equal to 33% of gross revenue. Once Wall Street caught on that the margin allowed a deployment entity is very limited, the stock fell dramatically. In truth, the cash flows in virtual print fee financing are healthy and backed by a solid industry. But the 3-way nature of these agreements – deployment entity, studio, and exhibitor – is complex, and that can spell risk to the institutional investor.

Additional risk is spelled out by the inability to value the equipment. The first test of secondary market value is now underway with Technicolor’s disposal of 300 screens-worth of digital cinema equipment. These systems were originally valued at around $90K per screen, and will probably get 1/3 of that price after 2-3 years of deployment. In part, that’s due to the lower cost of equipment today versus at the time of purchase. But the inevitability of accelerated devaluation is one of the risks of investing in technology assets.

Another risk is that of DCI Compliance. Four years after release of the DCI specification, no equipment sold on the market can proclaim that it fully meets the spec. The problem for banks is that DCI Compliance is a requirement of deployment agreements, which state that equipment in the field must be upgraded once DCI Compliant equipment is available. More damaging than accelerated devaluation, this spells obsolescence to the investor. It is difficult to get comfort from the technologists in this regard. DCI continues to revise its specification and test plan, causing manufacturers to frequently engage in retooling their products. (The latest activity in this regard is the ASM, explained in the SMPTE section of this report.)

It should be little surprise, then, that banks aren’t showing much interest in collateralizing loans with the equipment, and instead requiring exhibitors to provide guarantees. The result is that the original concept of the deployment entity is now flawed. The typical deployment entity is organized as a special purpose vehicle (SPV), protecting the parent company from bankruptcy. But the SPV is not holding assets that banks value. This complicates things for the exhibitor.

The exhibitor provides the financing and guarantees the loan, the studios provide the cash flow to recoup the loans, and the 3rd party deployment entity manages the cash flow. From the exhibitor’s point-of-view, the management of the 3rd party entity is a major risk factor. If the deployment entity misdirects funds, or fails in some other way, the exhibitor is on the hook to pay off the loan.

There are three ways to mitigate this problem: 1) the exhibitor buys from an entity that is self-financed and has other assets behind it (but be mindful of the inability to reach through an SPV), 2) the exhibitor takes a stake in the SPV to retain control (similar to DCIP in the US and DCIPA in Australia), 3) studios make payments directly to exhibitors. On the third point, Paramount and Fox offer such deals today. But without similar deals from the other studios, their offers aren’t of much value.

Filed Under: Deployment Entities Tagged With: VPF

Primary Sidebar

Search

Topics

  • 3-D
  • Accessibility
  • Alt Content & Advertising
  • Anti-Piracy
  • Color
  • Communications
  • Deployment Entities
  • Distributors
  • Exhibitors
  • Fulfillment
  • High Dynamic Range
  • Higher Frame Rates
  • Installations
  • Patents
  • Projectors
  • Servers and IMBs
  • Sound
  • Technical Bodies
  • Theatre Management Systems
  • Trade Organizations and Shows

Full Archives

a publication of
MKPE Consulting LLC

Footer

Important Stuff

  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Archives

  • Category & Monthly Archives
Archives date back to 2008.

MKPE

mkpeReport is a publication of MKPE, a world-class consultancy building business at the crossroads of cinema and technology.
Learn more about MKPE.

copyright © 2008 - 2023 mkpe consulting llc

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of all cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo