• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

mkpeReport

top analysis covering digital cinema, 3-D, HFR, and laser illumination

  • Reports
  • About
  • mkpe.com
  • cinepedia.com

One for All, But are All for One?

June 2011 by Michael Karagosian

There are those in the industry that continue to believe that DCI has burdened the motion picture industry with a huge expense, and they each have their solutions. There is the annual bloom of nubies touting (wrongly) how their application of consumer technology can do everything that DCI can. More annoyingly, there is always a politician waiting in the wings to lend them an ear. (Americans don’t have this problem…but nearly everyone else does.) None of this would take place, of course, if there wasn’t an audience of independents looking for low cost solutions, whether the art house cinema owner or the independent movie distributor.

It’s understandable that the independent mainstream and art house exhibitors seek a means to reduce exposure to the cost of new technology. Independent distributors have a different, less permanent reason, seeking to avoid a VPF payment per digital booking, which is more expensive than serially booking a single copy of a film print. In this particular case, both parties have the US studios as a common “enemy,” which leads to memorable press releases such as that recently issued by AG Kino in Germany, asking for establishment of a VPF through legislation and an alternative playback system to that promoted by DCI. Politicians just eat this stuff up.

To many people, an alternative system implies a non-DCI-compatible type of distribution. But a potentially troublesome possibility is introduced when the alternative system is file and key compatible with its DCI compliant brethren. Qube has an “e-cinema” server along this line, which accepts content packaged in the digital cinema DCP format, although it is not DCI compliant and sells for less. In addition, it has been long been reported that Doremi and Qube each developed file-compatible e-cinema projector-server combinations with Delta Electronics of Taiwan. Delta specializes in projectors having 5000 lumens or less, which would meet the needs of 2-D auditoriums with 8-meter or smaller screens. Exhibitors looking for low cost ways to convert might be attracted to such devices, and independent distributors might even encourage their installation. Further, with the emergence of DCI compliant in-projector media blocks, the situation gets even more complex.

For independent distributors, the logic of systems that are file-compatible but non-DCI-compliant works. They could create a compliant digital cinema DCP, and play it in both e-cinema and d-cinema-equipped auditoriums. The exhibitor that owns such a system, however, is restricted to only those distributions for which they can get a security key. If, say, a major studio authorizes key delivery messages (KDMs) on the 6th week of release for a blockbuster, then the exhibitor could play the blockbuster on its e-cinema system.

But for major studios, the logic of file-compatible but non-DCI-compliant systems faces some very real challenges. To release a movie on such a system could open a security hole if the system were not DCI compliant. Such objections could be overcome if the system were to utilize the new generation of DCI compliant media blocks. (While Texas Instruments might have a problem with another company copying its in-projector media block interface, let’s assume there are ways to bypass this objection, too.) The result would be a projector that may not pass the DCI tests for color and contrast, but would be no less secure than with a DCI compliant system, resulting in a new breed of second-tier system.

If a true second-tier system were to emerge that is file compatible and key compatible, it would require booking decisions to be made on the basis of system in adjunct with the usual business practice. One possibility is the emergence of multiple types of “trusted device lists,” or TDLs, where there would be the TDL of devices acceptable to major studios for on-the-break release, and a TDL of systems for after-the-break release. To complicate things, since DCI-compliant in-projector media blocks could move from non-compliant projector to a compliant projector, it wouldn’t be sufficient to know the security credentials of the media block. One would have to know the security credentials of the projector, as well.

There’s a very real possibility that a manufacturer not currently involved in the digital cinema market attempt to enter it by copying the TI in-projector media block interface. There’s also the possibility that such devices find their way into some markets, encouraged by independent distributors in the region. The mechanism for controlling this, however, already exists in the KDM itself, through the mechanism called “authorized device list.” This list can contain the security credentials of all of the projectors in a projection booth. Since a DCI compliant media block will know the security credentials of the projector to which it is connected, it can validate that these credentials are included in the KDM.

The idea of authorizing the projector-server combination through the KDM is not popular among exhibitors, who have need to move equipment around on occasion. Happily for them, not all studios make use of the authorized device list today. But if a second-tier projection system were to emerge, use of the authorized device list would quickly elevate. And a second-tier projection system could easily emerge if a politician-in-waiting in some remote region gets their way.

Filed Under: Servers and IMBs

Primary Sidebar

Search

Topics

  • 3-D
  • Accessibility
  • Alt Content & Advertising
  • Anti-Piracy
  • Color
  • Communications
  • Deployment Entities
  • Distributors
  • Exhibitors
  • Fulfillment
  • High Dynamic Range
  • Higher Frame Rates
  • Installations
  • Patents
  • Projectors
  • Servers and IMBs
  • Sound
  • Technical Bodies
  • Theatre Management Systems
  • Trade Organizations and Shows

Full Archives

a publication of
MKPE Consulting LLC

Footer

Important Stuff

  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Archives

  • Category & Monthly Archives
Archives date back to 2008.

MKPE

mkpeReport is a publication of MKPE, a world-class consultancy building business at the crossroads of cinema and technology.
Learn more about MKPE.

copyright © 2008 - 2023 mkpe consulting llc

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of all cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo