• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

mkpeReport

top analysis covering digital cinema, 3-D, HFR, and laser illumination

  • Reports
  • About
  • mkpe.com
  • cinepedia.com

A Dive Into The Hotfile Conviction

August 2013 by Michael Karagosian

The MPAA announced a milestone win against online file hosting service Hotfile, having convinced a U.S. Federal court that the service is liable for copyright infringement. Hotfile is one of dozens of such operations to be found on the web, often described as cloud storage services and cyberlockers. Many of these services have business models similar to that of Hotfile. Incorporated in Panama, Hotfile’s founder lives on US soil in Miami, which is thought to be the reason the company was targeted by the MPAA. (The founder was named in the lawsuit.)

File hosting services are quite common, and not necessarily evil. In fact, the trend in computing increasingly moves towards cloud storage and cloud computing, through services such as Apple iCloud, Google Drive, Microsoft SkyDrive, Dropbox, etc. Many of these services allow users to share files with others by simply sharing passwords and links – which can be quite convenient if the file is too large to email. The difference in services of this type is the amount of storage available, the cost of storage, maximum file size, and allowable frequency of uploads and downloads. Usually a limited degree of features are available for free, and users pay for enhanced access. The challenge presented by file hosting services to copyright holders is that the hosting service is the equivalent of a building owner that offers rental space for personal storage. If a tenant stores illegally copied DVDs in rented space, is the building owner guilty of copyright infringement? Some complicity has to exist.

The redacted transcript of the court order has yet to be released. However, judging by a published statement from Chris Dodd, MPAA CEO, it appears that the prosecution succeeded by proving that Hotfile’s business model is designed to encourage copyright infringement. Hotfile offers free accounts for file uploads and downloads, where a 400MB file size is imposed, and limits on the frequency of downloads are enforced. Premium accounts, which require paid subscriptions, allow for files up to 2GB in size, and remove the frequency limits for downloads. By itself, none of this leads to complicity in copyright infringement. It might be possible to prove complicity if a hosting site offered a search engine that revealed links to pirated content, but Hotfile does not offer a search engine for its site. It appears, though, that the MPAA’s approach was to prove complicity through Hotfile’s business model, focusing on Hotfile’s policy of paying premium users for each download by other subscribers, based on a formula that essentially shares the downloader’s subscription fee with the uploader. The more a file is downloaded, the more money the uploader makes, encouraging uploaders to share popular files, such as pirated movies. In turn, Hotfile profits by growing its subscriber base of downloaders. The challenge for the MPAA would have been to demonstrate that the vast majority of payers were downloading pirated content. More details will be known about the strength and breadth of the MPAA’s argument when the court releases the transcript.

The conviction of Hotfile will not stop file sharing per se. But it could have an important and significant impact on business models that encourage online sharing of pirated content. Assuming the conviction is upheld on appeal, the MPAA will likely use the US case as the basis for lawsuits against the many Hotfile look-alikes around the world.

Filed Under: Anti-Piracy Tagged With: Anti-Piracy, Hotfile, MPAA

Primary Sidebar

Search

Topics

  • 3-D
  • Accessibility
  • Alt Content & Advertising
  • Anti-Piracy
  • Color
  • Communications
  • Deployment Entities
  • Distributors
  • Exhibitors
  • Fulfillment
  • High Dynamic Range
  • Higher Frame Rates
  • Installations
  • Patents
  • Projectors
  • Servers and IMBs
  • Sound
  • Technical Bodies
  • Theatre Management Systems
  • Trade Organizations and Shows

Full Archives

a publication of
MKPE Consulting LLC

Footer

Important Stuff

  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Archives

  • Category & Monthly Archives
Archives date back to 2008.

MKPE

mkpeReport is a publication of MKPE, a world-class consultancy building business at the crossroads of cinema and technology.
Learn more about MKPE.

copyright © 2008 - 2023 mkpe consulting llc

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of all cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo